Money Is the New Religion (And It's a Bad One)
| Date | 2026-09-15 |
| Tags | #philosophy #spirituality #economics |
I’ve been reading Paul Kingsnorth’s Against the Machine, and one idea has been stuck in my head for weeks.
Western civilization was built around a sacred center. Christendom. That center collapsed. Slowly, over centuries, like a building whose foundation crumbles while the walls stay up. We kept the structures and drained out the meaning.
Money rushed into the gap.
Money as god
Money works like a religion in almost every way that matters.
It’s universal. It works in every culture and across every border. It demands sacrifice. Your time, your health, your relationships, the planet. It turns everything into the same units. A sunset, a surgery, and a semester of college all get priced in the same currency. It claims to be neutral while it decides what gets valued and who holds power. It punishes heresy. Try opting out and see what happens. And it promises salvation. Security, freedom, dignity. Money is the only road there.
The part Kingsnorth helped me see is that religion wasn’t just belief. It answered a practical question most of us don’t know we’re asking. What should I do today?
The old order had an answer. Go to work, care for your family, keep the sabbath, serve your community, fear God. It connected your Tuesday morning to something eternal.
Now the answer is make money so you can survive and maybe thrive. That’s the whole liturgy.
Why it’s a bad one
Money can’t produce the virtues it needs to keep working.
A real sacred framework answers the big questions. What makes a life meaningful? What deserves sacrifice? How do you suffer with dignity? What shouldn’t you do even when you can?
Money has nothing to say about any of that. It optimizes. It extracts. It scales. It can’t tell you why you’re alive or what matters when the optimizing stops working.
Kingsnorth pulls from Nietzsche here. If we can’t bear the death of God, we’ll replace God with something worse. I think that’s what happened. We didn’t become calm rationalists. We became money’s congregation, sacrificing without knowing what we’re worshipping.
You can feel it. Universities chasing rankings instead of wisdom. Hospitals chasing throughput instead of care. The neighborhood barbershop turning into a chain, because the point was never the haircut. It was the community. Community doesn’t scale. Money does.
Once you see it
Politics. The culture wars look less like policy fights and more like grief. People aren’t really fighting about pronouns or gas stoves. They lost a shared sacred story and don’t have words for that, so they lash out. It looks a lot like Babel. A civilization that chased infinite growth and total mastery and now can’t speak the same language.
Strongmen. Authoritarians don’t come from strength. They come from this vacuum. When the old story dies and nobody offers a new one, nostalgia is the only thing left to sell. “Make America Great Again” is more prayer than platform. A plea to go back to an order that felt coherent, even if it was unjust.
Tech. The AI obsession looks different too. Some of the people building it are building a replacement god. People already use it like an oracle, a conscience, a confessor. But AI fails as a god for the same reason money does. A god has to be able to say no in a way that means something. AI can’t. It can’t suffer. It can’t die. It can’t love or forgive. It’s authority without a body, which makes it authority without accountability.
What fills the void
So if money is a bad religion and AI is a bad god, what’s left?
Kingsnorth’s answer, and the one I keep coming back to, is that meaning needs things that don’t scale. A body that can suffer and die and make choices it can’t undo. Skin in the game. Traditions you inherit instead of inventing your values from scratch every morning. Humility about limits you didn’t set.
Meaning lives in the places money empties out. The barbershop before it became a chain. Craft done for its own sake. A community small enough to hold you accountable. Service without needing credit.
Aristotle, Kierkegaard, and Camus all land somewhere close. Meaning comes from finite people who commit, take risks, and accept limits they didn’t make.
I don’t think that means everyone needs to go back to church. Maybe some people do. I think it means we stop pretending money or algorithms can answer the questions only a lived life can. What’s worth keeping? What deserves reverence? What should I do today, not to optimize, but to live well?
Those questions don’t have efficient answers. Maybe that’s the point.